Go to main content

Sustainable supply chain management

Our progress in 2020.

Impact of COVID-19 on our activities in 2020

Impact of COVID-19 on our activities in 2020

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our suppliers had to refocus their priorities to safeguard business continuity. We engaged with them to understand the impact of the crisis and put risk-mitigation measures in place. As appropriate, we stopped, reduced, or replaced activities requiring on-the-ground and in-person contact, such as planned onsite sustainability-related audits. We enabled alternative solutions to continue monitoring our suppliers’ performance through, for example, the execution of remote audits. In parallel, we redeployed resources toward other initiatives such as capacity-building wherever possible. Despite the challenging circumstances of the global pandemic, we achieved, and in some cases, exceeded our 2020 sustainability targets, and we are confident in our ability to deliver on our objectives for 2021 and beyond. In our tobacco supply chain, we reacted fast, supporting our contracted farmers, their communities, and the field technicians throughout the crisis.

Read more in our Q2 2020 ALP Progress update.

A key component of our ALP program is farm-by-farm monitoring, whereby field technicians regularly visit farms, interact with farmers and other workers, and monitor the implementation of the ALP standards. To mitigate the risks of COVID-19 exposure for all involved, field technicians were provided with the recommended personal protective equipment (e.g., masks, gloves) and instructed to maintain social distancing. In addition, we canceled or reduced the number of visits in accord with national mandates or requirements of local affiliates and suppliers. Scheduled group meetings were replaced by individual farmer visits. During such visits, field technicians raised awareness of pandemic-related health and safety precautions, as farmers in many countries have continued to work (always in compliance with government regulations). In the countries where the crop season was starting mid-pandemic (e.g., Greece, Pakistan, Turkey, and the U.S.), most interactions were conducted remotely. The priority at this stage was to inform farmers of the ALP Code and clarify their rights and obligations before agreeing to and signing the contract online or by mail. Field technicians have also conducted virtual check-ins to ensure farmers have sufficient personal protective equipment for relevant farming activities.

Monitoring the sustainability performance of our critical suppliers

We started onboarding our critical non-tobacco suppliers in our due diligence STEP platform in 2019, focusing first on our direct materials and electronics supply chains. In 2020, we exceeded our target of assessing suppliers representing 90 percent of our spend in those categories.

By the end of the year, 113 critical tier-1 suppliers, representing 95 percent of our critical supplier spend on the direct materials and electronics categories, had completed self-assessments. Of them, 45 percent were shown to be compliant with PMI’s RSP, while for 17 percent, the self-assessment triggered targeted follow-up actions. The assessments revealed significant gaps for the remaining 38 percent of suppliers, mainly related to resource consumption and waste minimization, freedom of association, and risk of child labor. In a number of cases, desktop audits were undertaken—as on-site audits were not possible due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In 2020, we completed 29 desktop audits: 93 percent of suppliers improved their performance compared with the results of their self-assessment. This indicates that the guidance provided by auditors at the time of the desktop audits improves the quality and completeness of the answers provided by respondents to our STEP questionnaire. Overall, 86 percent of the suppliers that underwent the desktop audit demonstrated compliance with our RSP, while 14 percent reported significant gaps.

In parallel, we started onboarding non-tobacco suppliers in other supply chain categories. In total, suppliers representing more than 15 percent of our spend on technical procurement, R&D expenditure, and indirect materials and services completed our due diligence process by the end of the year. In 2020, we also onboarded our STEP program tier-2 suppliers with whom PMI manages the commercial relationship and holds an agreement. We covered 100 percent of the tier-2 suppliers of our board and paper direct suppliers and 92 percent of the tier-2 suppliers of electronic components (such as batteries and blades) of our electronic manufacturing suppliers.

During the year, to address our evolving needs and reflect market developments, we embarked on a reassessment of our STEP platform. We benchmarked our solution with the broader due diligence market, with the aim of leveraging state-of-the-art digital solutions aligned with best practices and standards and allowing for advanced reporting capabilities. Further, we considered how to optimize efforts for both our company and our suppliers through a collaboration-promoting tool that enables us to share assessments across companies and industries. We concluded that our current platform did not provide the functionalities and capabilities required to advance our due diligence program to the next level, and plan to start the implementation of a new solution in 2021. Our analysis also highlighted the opportunity to enhance our approach by focusing on the management of online evaluations and on-site audits through different service providers. With regard to on-site audits, we plan to select and partner with several specialized providers in 2021.

In this chapter

  • Impact of COVID-19
  • Monitoring the sustainability performance of our critical suppliers
  • Fostering collaboration with our network of suppliers
  • Focus on our electronics supply chain
  • Conflict minerals
  • Cobalt
  • PMI’s Good Agricultural Practices program
  • Monitoring GAP implementation
  • Industry-wide Sustainable Tobacco Program
  • Next steps

Sustainable supply chain management - topic overview

read more

Developing long-term effective relationships across our supply chains is most critical to success, as close collaboration and ongoing engagement with our suppliers are essential to realize the ambitious sustainability objectives we set forth.

Cesare Guarini

,

Director, Sustainability Procurement, Philip Morris International

Fostering collaboration with our network of suppliers

We dedicated a section of PMI.com to describing our company, goals, and purpose with regard to our current and potential suppliers. It also details how Procurement is organized within PMI, reinforces the expectations we have toward our suppliers regarding our RSP, and discloses some of the guidelines and general terms and conditions we build our partnerships on.

To increase awareness of sustainability in our supply chain, we held virtual events, webcasts, and training sessions with strategic suppliers globally in 2020. These events covered both general and specific topics, from supplier onboarding, to STEP, to partnering on our Zero Deforestation Manifesto and carbon footprint reduction targets. For instance, we organized two CDP training sessions for our electronics suppliers, one in English and one in Mandarin, with over 100 participants. Such activities reinforce our expectations and commitments, promote the exchange of expertise and best practices, and identify potential areas for closer collaboration.

Our suppliers play a major role in our transformation journey. Therefore, we consider it fundamental to recognize our suppliers’ excellent performance and contribution to PMI’s business goals, fostering long-term partnerships and value creation. To this end, in 2020 we launched our Global Supplier Recognition program. We recognized selected suppliers for their sustainability commitment and performance, active contribution to PMI’s value creation, and engagement in innovation. In a virtual ceremony attended by around 400 participants, five of our suppliers were awarded in the areas of sustainability, innovation, and value creation.

For the fourth consecutive year, in 2020 CDP placed PMI on the CDP Supplier Engagement Leaderboard in recognition of our efforts and progress on our supplier engagement on climate change. PMI’s Supplier Engagement Rating (SER) positions us in the top 7 percent of companies that disclosed for CDP’s full climate questionnaire. By engaging our suppliers on climate change, we aim to contribute to their transition toward a net-zero sustainable economy.

sustainable-supply-chain-indonesia

Focus on our electronics supply chain

As our company continues to transform and build new capabilities, we simultaneously look at risks inherent in specific supply chains; a key area of focus is our relatively new and expanding electronic manufacturing supply base in Asia.

As our supply base widens, we strengthen our selection and onboarding process of electronic suppliers involved in the manufacture of our smoke-free devices. For new suppliers, we collect information on their practices, ask them to complete a self-assessment questionnaire, and provide a third-party audit report and an update on any corrective actions taken as a result. We then hold an on-site management review before entering into a contractual agreement in which we include sustainability clauses and required adherence and compliance with our RSP. We then integrate the supplier into our STEP platform and due diligence program.

Our tier-1 electronics suppliers were assessed through our STEP platform in 2020 and demonstrated excellent performance by reporting practices in line with PMI standards. No follow-up action in any sustainability area was necessary from this assessment. On top of our due diligence through STEP, we monitored manufacturers’ performance via sustainability scorecards and key performance indicators. We revamped our criteria in 2020 to focus on inherent risks, such as working hours and labor rights, environmental performance, supply chain management, and overall sustainability and business integrity.

    Companies are expected to demonstrate how they respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict in their mineral-purchasing decisions and practices. This applies particularly to the potential adverse impacts associated with sourcing tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold (“3TGs”) from conflict-affected and high-risk areas of the world. Our2020 conflict minerals submission covering the year ended December 31, 2019, showed that the smelters from which our suppliers source 3TGs for our Covered Products (as defined in the submission) are either compliant with the Responsible Minerals Initiative audit program (265 smelters) or were going through the assessment process (two smelters).
    2020 conflict minerals submission

    2020 conflict minerals submission

    Cobalt is a critical raw material in the production of the batteries used in our smoke-free products. While the quantities of cobalt required for our products are minor compared with the total global market size, since 2019 we have been deploying a due diligence program based on the RMI approach and tools to identify and address potential human rights risks in the supply chains of our suppliers. In 2020, all our battery suppliers fulfilled specific reporting requirements, including information on the smelters from which they source. On that basis, subsequent due diligence deploying additional RMI tools indicated that, as of December 31, 2020, all the smelters from which PMI battery suppliers source cobalt were on either RMI’s conformant (seven smelters) or active list (eight smelters).

    Performance highlights

    • 33 %

      Proportion of direct supply chain spend related to smoke-free products

    • 95 %

      of our non-tobacco critical suppliers spend assessed in PMI's supplier due diligence platform

    • 99 %

      of tobacco purchased through direct contracts by PMI and PMI tobacco suppliers

    PMI’s Good Agricultural Practices program

    PMI defines sustainable tobacco production as the efficient and competitive production of quality tobacco in conditions that limit as much as possible the impact on the natural environment and improve the socio-economic condition of the people and communities involved in its production.

    In our tobacco supply chain, production is managed in accordance with our Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). GAP was first introduced in 2002. Since then, it has been updated and improved to reflect feedback received from farmers, suppliers, and stakeholders, and to keep up with ever more demanding expectations and technological developments. PMI has initiated major revisions of GAP, introducing the Agricultural Labor Practices (ALP) Code in 2011 and ALP Step Change in 2018. GAP defines the principles and measurable standards to be met by all those who grow and supply tobacco to PMI. The principles guide suppliers and farmers toward sustainable production. We use measurable standards to measure how well the practices on the farms or at the suppliers are aligned with our principles. These principles and standards are organized around four focus areas:

    • Governance: PMI expects suppliers to have in place the necessary governance, procedures, and processes to manage contracts, field technicians, visits, and training.
    • Crop: The crop must meet specific criteria on quality, style, integrity, and regulatory compliance. GAP also demands that the crop is grown with the appropriate seed variety, with the correct plant nutrition, and using effective integrated pest management practices to minimize the use of crop protection agents while improving yield. Mechanization practices are also promoted.
    • Environment: Tobacco farmers are encouraged to preserve, reuse, and recycle the natural resources used in tobacco production, including wood, water, and fuel.
    • People: PMI is committed to eliminating child labor and other labor abuses on all farms from which we source tobacco. Our ALP Code guides our work in this regard.

    GAP is mandatory for all suppliers of tobacco to PMI, as is reflected in the supply contracts of PMI and its affiliates. PMI expects all its suppliers to continuously improve the implementation of GAP principles and standards in coordination with the farmers from whom they purchase. The absence of a clear commitment to act on issues identified, or a persistent lack of action and improvement, can lead to contractual implications for both farmers and suppliers. PMI also reserves the right to terminate contracts immediately in cases of severe violations impacting people, the crop, or the environment.

    Overview of our tobacco supply chain in 2020

    Overview of our tobacco supply chain in 2020

    In 2020, we sourced tobacco from 285,900 farmers we either directly contracted through our Leaf operations in six countries or who were contracted by our 14 third-party suppliers. In both instances, our GAP standards and related monitoring and remediation system apply at farm level. Our third-party leaf suppliers are required to adhere to PMI’s RSP and GAP.

    During the year, we sourced 281,000 tons of packed tobacco grown across 23 countries, with most of our volume coming from Argentina, Brazil, and Indonesia.

    While the profile of each contracted farmer varies significantly between geographies, most of our supply base consists of smallholder farmers cultivating less than two hectares of tobacco in rural areas with limited access to basic infrastructure. Under our program to ensure contracted farmers earn a living income, we aim to help them improve productivity, which can imply increasing the average surface of tobacco grown per farmer.

    Read more: Socioeconomic well-being of tobacco-farming communities

    Monitoring GAP implementation

    To a large extent, responsible sourcing is achieved when relationships on the ground are strong. PMI’s Integrated Production System (IPS) connects leaf suppliers and farmers beyond the customary boundaries of a commercial relationship and enables direct technical support, agronomic advice, financial loans, and various other services. This direct contractual relationship between PMI and our leaf suppliers and farmers without intermediaries is especially important when conditions are uncertain, as it was demonstrated in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. IPS—which covered 99 percent of our tobacco purchases in 2020—brought financial security to our farmers by ensuring them a guarantee of purchase for the contracted volume.

    Malawi-field-technician

    Industry-wide Sustainable Tobacco Program

    In parallel to our GAP program, and as an additional way to evaluate supplier performance, we have been participating since 2016 in the industrywide Sustainable Tobacco Program (STP). The program is administered by a third-party service provider and has been adopted by all major global tobacco manufacturers and their leaf suppliers. The objective of STP is to assess suppliers’ performance more consistently to drive continuous improvement in addressing systemic issues across the global tobacco leaf supply chain. At PMI, STP applies to our tier-1 suppliers, including our third-party leaf suppliers, as well as our own leaf operations. All of our sourcing origins were formally reviewed and visited between 2016 and 2018 (including on-the-ground visits to a sample of tobacco farms and a comprehensive review of suppliers’ policies, procedures, and practices by a third-party specialist in supply chain management).

    eight-themes-sustainable-tobacco-program

    Pilot with Produzindo Certo in Brazil

    In 2020, our affiliate in Brazil (PMB) partnered with Produzindo Certo, a local company specializing in agribusiness socio-environmental management, to pilot a project aimed at improving farming efficiency and promoting effective use of natural and human resources. We felt the need to specialize further our PMB field technicians in sustainability to better support our integrated farmers to make more impact and to reach ambitious sustainability targets in Brazil. The pilot was carried out with the participation of 123 farmers.

    To execute the program, PMB divided the field technicians into two groups: “production field technicians,” who continued to support all aspects related to GAP implementation, improvements in productivity, quality, and product integrity; and the “sustainability field technicians,” who focused exclusively on the environmental and social aspects. The sustainability technicians were trained by Produzindo Certo to evaluate the farmer practices, with regard to water quality, soil erosion, native vegetation, and work safety, among other aspects. To do this, they relied on the Produzindo Certo platform, which offers all the resources and indicators necessary for diagnosing and improving farming practices from a socio-environmental standpoint. Each farm assessment highlighted both areas of strengths and areas for improvement and resulted in an individual “sustainability scorecard” broken down for social, environmental, and production aspects. Action plans were then established, tailored to each farm.

    Farmers could commit on a voluntary basis to implement the action plan designed specifically for their farm and see their score improving over time as they progressed. The pilot proved valuable to gain insights into improvement areas and generated a very high acceptance level among farmers. The strength of the program comes from the independent third-party assessment conducted by specialized teams, defining action plans in agreement with the growers, and monitoring progress over time. PMB already plans to extend this program to all its contracted farmers (around 5,300 in total) by 2022 and is considering opening the initiative to tobacco suppliers and to service providers in the supply chain.

    Next steps

    In 2021, we plan to further enhance our sustainability programs in the supply chain.

    We plan to transition our STEP due diligence platform, partnering with a leading service provider. Through this, we will be able to access and leverage the provider’s state-of-the-art digital platform and tools, and very large existing supplier base, while continuing to expand our STEP program across different spend categories in our supply chain.

    We also expect to onboard PMI and our electronics suppliers in the RBA initiatives through the deployment of the coalition’s approaches, tools, and capability-building activities.

    We will extend the deployment of the PMI RSP sustainability clause in suppliers’ commercial agreements, while also continuing to organize and deliver capability-building activities, both internally and with our suppliers.

    We will explore opportunities to extend grievance mechanisms for workers in our supply chain, focusing first on electronics suppliers, while continuing to strengthen our programs in cobalt and conflict minerals.

    In our tobacco supply chain, we will roll out the STP 2.0 program with the first in-depth assessments on the ground, and will evaluate inviting global tobacco leaf suppliers to our STEP program.

    Performance metrics

    view data

    This online content about our Integrated Report should be read in conjunction with PMI’s 2020 Integrated Report. The information and data presented here cover the 2020 calendar year or reflect status at December 31, 2020, worldwide, unless otherwise indicated. Where not specified, data come from PMI estimates. Please also refer to 'About this report' on page 3 of the 2020 Integrated Report for more information. Aspirational targets and goals do not constitute financial projections, and achievement of future results is subject to risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions, as outlined in our forward-looking and cautionary statements on page 145. In the 2020 Integrated Report and in related communications, the terms “materiality,” “material,” and similar terms, when used in the context of economic, environmental, and social topics, are defined in the referenced sustainability standards and are not meant to correspond to the concept of materiality under the U.S. securities laws and/or disclosures required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


    Other topics in this strategic pillar

    Responsible marketing and sales practices

    Globally, the commercialization of tobacco products is subject to extensive rules and regulations.

    Respect for human rights

    Respect for human rights must be embedded in our corporate culture to shape the way we work and guide interactions in the communities in which we operate.

    Data privacy and protection

    In recent years, there has been increasing public awareness of privacy issues and greater scrutiny by stakeholders of how companies approach data privacy. Global data protection laws have become more prevalent and rigorously enforced.